
Quebec City blends old and new.

The tiny skeletal hand jutted from the sand as if beckoning the living to the long dead.
For thousands of years, it had waved unheeded in the most desolate section of the Sahara desert, surrounded by the bones of hippos, giraffes and other creatures typically found in the jungle.
A chance discovery by American scientists has led to the unearthing of a Stone Age cemetery that is providing the first glimpse of what life was likeduring the still-mysterious period when monsoons brought rain to the desert and created the "green Sahara."
The more than 200 graves explored indicate that, beginning 10,000 years ago, two distinct populations lived on the shores of a massive lake, separated by a 1,000-year period during which the lake dried up. Among the scientists' surprising discoveries was a burial of a mother and two children with fingers intertwined, a find that puts a human face on the little-known people who enjoyed a brief visit to an Eden in what is normally one of the most forbidding places on Earth.
The first to settle the area was a group of tall, powerfully built hunters, gatherers and fishermen called the Kiffian, University of Chicago paleontologist Paul Sereno said at a news conference Thursday. The group that followed the Kiffian was a physically smaller band of pastoralists called the Tenerian, who relied on fishing and hunting, but also herded cattle, he said.
In addition to the graves, researchers found a massive collection of the remains of meals, tools, pots and other artifacts -- the detritus of everyday life.
The findings were published Thursday in the online journal PLoS One and in the September issue of National Geographic magazine. The Sahara has been a desert for untold millenniums. But about 12,000 years ago, a wobble in the Earth's orbit and other factors caused Africa's
seasonal monsoons to shift slightly north, bringing rains to the Sahara and greening it from Egypt in the east to Mauritania in the west.
About 8,000 years ago, the rains retreated, leaving the region once again arid and abandoned. A thousand years later, the rains returned for two millenniums, before permanently retreating.
The newly discovered site, called Gobero after the Tuareg name for the area, lies deep within Niger's Tenere Desert, a large region within the still larger Sahara. The site lay unobserved and untouched because it was literally "in the middle of nowhere," Mr. Sereno said. "There is absolutely no reason for anyone to go there."
Mr. Sereno had a reason -- a nearby table of 110-million-year-old sandstone "that has more dinosaurs in it of high quality than any other rock in the continent of Africa."
In 2000, Mr. Sereno and colleagues were on one of their forays in which they would travel as far as they could in one day, looking for new dinosaur bones.
"We were at the end of our rope," Mr. Sereno said, nearly out of water and ready to turn around, when he spotted a stone formation sticking up in the distance and decided to go a little farther. When they got there, they found animal bones scattered on the surface, exposed by the weather. Photographer Mike Hettwer wandered, then rushed back to the group.
"I found some bones," he said. "But they're not dinosaurs. They're human." The hand, probably belonging to a child, stood out amid the flat landscape, its finger blackened but intact. The researchers saw parts of dozens of human skeletons, including jawbones with teeth and skullcaps filled with sand.
Mr. Sereno and the group "tiptoed in and saw a dozen skeletons" but didn't disturb anything, he said. "I realized we were in the green Sahara." They left the site alone for three years while Mr. Sereno continued dinosaur excavations. Eventually, he excavated for three seasons, before being frozen out of the area in 2007 and 2008 because of clashes between the Tuareg and government troops.
One of the experts he took with him was archeologist Elena Garcea of the University of Cassino in Italy, a pottery expert who has spent three decades working in northern Africa.
She immediately spied small potsherds inscribed with a pointillistic pattern characteristic of a nomadic people called the Tenerian that lived 6,500 to 4,500 years ago. But she quickly found others that had a wavy, zig-zag pattern characteristic of the Kiffian, hunters and gatherers who lived 10,000 to 8,000 years ago.
That dichotomy continued throughout the excavations. One group of graves contained individuals who averaged more than six feet tall, with some astall as six feet eight inches. These individuals, the Kiffian, were folded in tight burial arrangements with their knees against their chests and arms at their sides.
Accompanying the graves were remains of elephants, giraffes, hartebeests, warthogs and pythons, as well as abundant six-foot-long, 300-pound Nile perch, which indicated the presence of a deep lake at the site during the period.
The team found harpoon points and fishing hooks as well as stone tools associated with the Kiffian. Their bodies were heavily muscled and robust, suggesting that they were active fishermen. In other graves, bodies were shorter and slender, characteristic of pastoralists who fished less and herded more. The same animals, as well as cattle, were associated with them, but the fish were smaller catfish and tilapia, suggesting that the lake was shallower during their occupation.
The most touching grave was the burial triptych. A young woman lay on her side. Pollen under her body suggested she was placed on a bed of flowers. Lying on their sides facing her were two young children, their fingers interlocked with hers, leaving a tangle of bones.
It is not clear how they died. The team is running DNA tests to confirm that they are mother and children.

He reminds us of two things. First, the Conservatives are hardly innocent of causing chaos in committees -- remember their 200 page handbook on how to hijack committee meetings. Second, if Parliament is so dysfunctional how is it that it passed almost all the legislation put forward by the Government?
None of this is to say we shouldn't have an election this fall. But we should have one because this Parliament is tired and needs a new mandate and not because of a false claim of dysfunction.
VANCOUVER (CBC) - The Canadian men's rowing pair Scott Frandsen and Dave Calder have ended Canada's Olympic medal drought.[26] I agree with the position of counsel for the appellants that the trial judge failed to provide sufficient reasons to allow for meaningful appellate review. In reaching my conclusion, I have found helpful the recent decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. Dinardo, (2008), 231 C.C.C. (3d) 177 (Sup. Ct. Can.), and R. v. Walker, (2008), 231 C.C.C. (3d) 289 (Sup. Ct. Can.).
[27] In Dinardo, Charron J. reviewed the jurisprudence that requires a trial judge to provide meaningful reasons for conviction or acquittal, with particular emphasis on the leading decision in R. v. Sheppard, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 869. In the course of this review, Charron J. emphasizes that an appeal court reviewing the sufficiency of reasons should adopt a "functional approach", examining the evidence as a whole and the submissions of counsel in the assessment of whether the reasons respond to the case's live issues. She emphasizes that it is only where "the trial judge's reasons are so deficient that they foreclose meaningful appellate review", that the appeal based on insufficient reasons will be allowed: Dinardo at para. 25.
[28] At paras. 30 & 32, in comments relevant to this appeal, Charron J. concluded:
[T]here is no general requirement that reasons be so detailed that they allow an appeal court to retry the entire case on appeal. There is no need to prove that the trial judge was alive to and considered all of the evidence, or answer each and every argument of counsel (Braich, at para. 38).
...
This Court emphasized in Sheppard that no error will be found where the basis for the trial judge's conclusion is "apparent from the record, even without being articulated" (para. 55). If the trial judge's reasons are deficient, the reviewing court must examine the evidence and determine whether the reasons for conviction are, in fact, patent on the record. This exercise is not an invitation to appellate courts to engage in a reassessment of aspects of the case not resolved by the trial judge. Where the trial judge's reasoning is not apparent from the reasons or the record...the appeal court ought not to substitute its own analysis for that of the trial judge (Sheppard, at paras. 52 and 55). [Emphasis added.]
[29] The principles espoused in Dinardo are recognized as well by Binnie J. in R. v. Walker at para. 20, who also refers to Sheppard and the principle that "[t]he appellate court is not given the power to intervene simply because it thinks the trial court did a poor job of expressing itself". Binnie J. also refers to Sheppard's recognition of a number of broad policy reasons that underscore the importance of the duty to give adequate reasons at para. 19:
At the trial level, the reasons justify and explain the result. "Reasons for judgment are the primary mechanism by which judges account to the parties and to the public for the decisions they render" (para. 15). The losing party is entitled to know why he or she has lost. Informed consideration can be given to grounds for appeal. "Interested members of the public can satisfy themselves that justice has been done, or not, as the case may be" (para. 24). "Trial courts, where the essential findings of facts and drawing of inferences are done, can only be held properly to account if the reasons for their adjudication are transparent and accessible to the public and to the appellate courts" (para. 15).
[30] It appears that the entire focus of the trial judge's reasons in this case was whether the Crown had proved that the appellants were guilty of conspiracy. She understood the issues, which were whether the Crown had proved a conspiracy and whether the appellants were members of it. My main problem with the trial judge's reasons is that she made so few findings of fact on her way to the conclusory finding that each appellant was guilty as charged - meaning guilty of conspiracy and the individual counts of fraud over $5,000 with which each appellant was charged. Consequently, the facts on which she based the convictions are lacking. Because reasons for conviction were not patent on the record, I am unable to determine the analytical path she followed in convicting the appellants. Consequently, the trial judge failed to provide sufficient reasons to allow for meaningful appellate review.

The recent propane explosion in
Because so many people have been harmed the best route, procedurally, may be a class proceeding or class action.
A class proceeding allows one person to start a lawsuit on behalf of themselves as well as all others who have suffered similar harm arising from a situation common to the class members.
This means that a single person can commence a class proceeding on behalf of hundreds or thousands of people.
What triggers a class action? Usually it is something you hear as breaking news such as:
􀀞 Major fire that has sent a smoke plume over a wide area.
􀀞 Environmental spill.
􀀞 "Insider trading" by senior officers of a company.
􀀞 Multi-vehicle crash on a highway.
􀀞 Blood contamination issues.
􀀞 Train derailment.
􀀞 Food poisoning.
􀀞 Or, as now, a propane explosion.
Class actions are fairly new in
A critical question is whether there is sufficient similarity among the potential members of the class – the people harmed – that a single person can represent the entire class. There must be enough common issues among all the members of the class to make a class action or proceeding the preferable way of going ahead.
All that said, before any class action goes ahead the claim itself has to be worthwhile.
In news reports about the potential propane class action all sorts of defendants have been mentioned. Certainly the propane company makes sense as a defendant but suing the City of
The Canadian Press
OTTAWA -- With a possible fall election around the corner, a new poll suggests there could be trouble ahead for Stephen Harper's Conservatives.
The Canadian Press, Harris-Decima survey suggests the Liberals and Tories are in a virtual dead heat for overall national support.
But the Liberals have pulled ahead in support in Ontario and Quebec, crucial battlegrounds that will determine the outcome of a countrywide vote.
Harris-Decima vice-president Jeff Walker says the Liberals have a significant advantage in Ontario, especially in large, urban centres.
Nationally, Liberal support was up slightly to 33 per cent, statistically tied with the Tories at 32 per cent.
The New Democrats followed at 15 per cent, followed by the Greens at six per cent.
In Quebec, the Liberals were virtually tied with the Bloc Quebecois, at 30 per cent and 29 per cent respectively, followed by the Tories at 24 per cent, the Greens at eight per cent and the N-D-P at six per cent.
Walker says it appears no one has gained ground based on the unveiling of the Liberal Green Shift environmental plan.
The telephone poll of just over one-thousand Canadians was conducted August 7th thru 10th, and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.
Full story here:
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080814/decima_poll_080814/20080814?hub=TopStories&s_name=
In fairness, the punishment of beheading is only a possibility; and Canada had the death penalty for murder until fairly recently (just ask Mr. Truscott). Still, this case sounds like manslaughter at worst and since Canada fought for Brenda Martin Canada should try to help here.Cornwall Standard-Freeholder (ON)
Wed 13 Aug 2008
Page: 19
Section: News
Byline: BY JIM BROWN, THE CANADIAN PRESS
Dateline: OTTAWA
An all-party committee of MPs has decided to press ahead with its job of vetting potential nominees for the Supreme Court -- despite opposition worries about the presence on the panel of two Conservative cabinet ministers.
"In the end, we decided unanimously to accept the present composition," Bloc Quebecois MP Real Menard said after the issue was hashed out at a closed-door session of the panel Tuesday.
He said the question of whether cabinet members should sit on similar advisory groups in future will be referred to the Commons justice committee for further study.
"So we're working with the people who were named but we think we made our point," he told RDI, the CBC's French news network.
The comments mark a sharp turnaround from a day earlier when Menard had vowed to work for the removal from the advisory panel of Public Works Minister Christian Paradis and Diane Ablonczy, the secretary of state for small business.
The Bloc and NDP had complained that cabinet members aren't free to offer independent advice on who should fill the seat on the high court.
New Democrat MP Joe Comartin confirmed the committee had decided to press ahead with the task of delivering a short list of candidates to Prime Minister Stephen Harper to fill the Supreme Court vacancy created when Justice Michel Bastarache stepped down in June because of health problems.
Comartin said the panel has set a timetable of mid-to late September for making its recommendations to Harper.
He declined to go into further detail, saying members had concluded a new confidentiality agreement that will make Ablonczy, as committee chair, the sole spokesperson from now on.
Ablonczy could not be reached for comment, and a spokeswoman said only that the minister considered the outcome of the meeting "very positive."
Dominic LeBlanc, the Liberal member of the panel, has had nothing to say on the subject since the dispute first surfaced. Justice Minister Rob Nicholson
made it clear this week that he had no intention of backing down on the point.
"Ultimately, the appointment of a Supreme Court justice is a function of the executive," said Nicholson.
"We've put this process in place and we have the right to name some individuals . . . We're not providing a veto to the Bloc or the NDP on these things."
Under the Constitution, appointments to the Supreme Court are the sole responsibility of the prime minister. But Nicholson announced last spring the government would set up the special committee of MPs to play an advisory role in the process.
On Tuesday, the government handed over a preliminary list of candidates it had compiled on its own. The job of the parliamentary penal will be to shorten the list to three names, from which Harper will make the ultimate choice.
Nicholson is hoping to have the new judge in place by the time the court begins its fall term in early October, but has made no promises on that score.
KABUL, Afghanistan - A militant ambush of a U.S. aid organization's vehicle Wednesday killed an American aid worker along with a British-Canadian and a Trinidadian colleague, officials said.
The three women who worked for the New York-based International Rescue Committee were attacked in Logar province, south of Kabul, said Abdullah Khan, the deputy counterterrorism director in Logar. The women's Afghan driver was also killed, said Khan.http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/080813/world/afghan_cda_worker_killed
If true it's pretty silly (and gross)Video shows Burger King employee bathing in sink
It happened at the Burger King on Orange Street in Xenia.
A four-minute video posted on MySpace captured the employee, self-described as Mr. Unstable, bathing nude in a large stainless steel sink as several other employees and a store manager looked on.
The video began making its rounds on the Internet Monday morning. One of the recipients was Greene County Health Commissioner, Mark McDonnell.
"My first thought was oh my god," said McDonnell.
McDonnell immediately sent staff to restaurant to investigate the numerous health code violations.
He said the restaurant was aware of the incident and had already taken steps to clean up, including disposing of all the utensils and sanitizing the sink twice.
All of the employees involved were fired.
"You can't account for everyone's stupid actions but when things do happen if you respond to it and take the appropriate action that's reassuring," McDonnell said.
Some Burger King patrons don't agree.
"That's just, it's wrong it's a place where families come to eat and them taking a bath in the sink that's just not work ethic," said Crystal Dodge, who said she used to eat at Burger King all the time.
2News reporter Megan O'Rourke went to the Xenia Burger King Monday afternoon looking for comment, but was met at the door by an employee who asked her to leave and referred comment to Burger King's corporate office.
Burger King spokesperson Denise Wilson emailed the following statement to 2News Monday afternoon:
"Burger King Corp. was just notified of this incident and is cooperating fully with the health department. We have sanitized the sink and have disposed of all other kitchen tools and utensils that were used during the incident.
We have also taken appropriate corrective action on the employees that were involved in this video. Additionally, the remaining staff at this restaurant is being retrained in health and sanitation procedures."
But for diners like Crystal, it may be too little, too late.
"That's just disgusting. I wouldn't want to eat here after I heard something like that, that's just not appropriate for employment," Dodge said.
"This kind of stunt really is a black eye for the restaurant itself."
Health Department officials plan to talk with prosecutors to see if any criminal charges will be filed, but they don't have any plans to issue fines at this time.
Report by Megan O'Rourke, WDTN. Web produced by Tony Heitmeyer.
Karen Selick, National Post Published: Wednesday, August 13, 2008
During 21 years of practising matrimonial law, I've learned that no matter how convincing the story my client tells while sitting across the desk from me, the picture will change when I hear the other spouse's version of the same events. Sometimes the change will be slight, sometimes enormous. Occasionally I can hardly believe that both people are describing the same incidents.
That's why the legal maxim audi alteram partem, meaning "hear the other side," evolved centuries ago -- to caution judges and juries about the danger of reaching conclusions without having heard both sides of the story.
But when one spouse has murdered the other, as Teresa Pohchoo Craig of Kemptville, Ont., did to her husband Jack, the court gets to hear only one side of the story -- the murderer's. And when the murderer says she was an abused wife and therefore deserves leniency, what should we believe?
Ms. Craig's recent trial in Ottawa heard evidence that one night, while Jack slept under the influence of alcohol and marijuana, she put a pillow over his face and stabbed him repeatedly with a butcher knife. In a videotaped statement made to police later, she admitted they had not even been arguing that night. Rather, she said: "I hate him, that's why I kill him. Enough is enough. Get rid of him."
Full story here:
http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/story.html?id=719006
Right -- First Green
The issue here is technological. If the ankle bracelets work and are cost effective they are a good idea. Anyone in the courts knows breaches of release conditions are very common and the police cannot be everywhere checking up on releasees.
That said, the bracelets may not be the way to go if they are too costly or don't really work. Sometimes technology will give a false sense of security.
But the response is to see if they work -- just making fun of the idea isn't productive.
Ottawa's ankle bracelet initiative called 'correctional quackery'
The Globe and Mail
Tue 12 Aug 2008
Page: A4
Section: National News
Byline: Josh Wingrove
It was good enough for Lindsay Lohan, but a Canadian trial program that will fit 30 federal parolees with ankle bracelet tracking devices is just "correctional quackery," one critic says.
The comments were made after Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day announced yesterday the trial "electronic monitoring" program. Beginning next month, 30 federal prisoners in Ontario will be "strongly encouraged" when paroled to participate in the ankle bracelet trial period. If they do not agree, the parole board could view it as a sign of the prisoner being unco-operative, Mr. Day added.
But the irremovable gizmos aren't proven; their signals fade, and their Global Positioning Satellite tracking isn't always real-time, said Craig Jones, executive director of the John Howard Society, a prisoners' advocacy group. He cited a 2007 study that called the ankle bracelets "correctional quackery."
"There's a tendency to go for the technological fix, the technological fetishism. But the technology is really untested, untried," said Mr. Jones, an advocate of "evidence-backed" parole programs such as counselling and training. "There isn't a kind of quick fix available here."
The trial program will run for one year at a cost of $600,000, and is based on a similar model in Nova Scotia. Police are alerted when an offender breaks curfew or location restrictions, such as visiting a children's playground when prohibited from doing so. The cost includes staffing and the one-year rental of the 30 devices from the Nova Scotia government.
KANDAHAR, Afghanistan - A burly "mountain of a man" nicknamed the Friendly Giant became the second Canadian combat death in three days when insurgents attacked a remote outpost in the Panjwaii district of Kandahar province Monday.
Master Cpl. Erin Doyle was the 90th Canadian soldier to die since the Afghan mission began in 2002.
Chief Warrant Officer Chris White, who knew Doyle for five years, described the 200-pound man as a "barrel-chested kind of guy, the kind you'd "like to sit down and have a beer with."
Full story here:
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/080811/national/afghan_cda_death
TORONTO - Canada's housing market lost some steam in July as the fevered pace of new home and condo construction cooled, especially in Ontario, after prices rose at their slowest pace in over six years in June in the face of sharply slower economic growth.
Canada's national economy "is flat on its back" after two straight monthly declines in employment, Sal Guatieri, senior economist at BMO Capital Markets, said Monday.
As a result, he said, people are "anxious and worried about the economic outlook," (and) "are not inclined to make big-ticket purchases like homes."
He also said the housing slowdown comes as a kind of payback after "unsustainably strong" building activity in past years and prices being "overly high for too long."
Helene Begin, senior economist with Desjardins Securities, said "it is possible that poor weather conditions, particularly in central and eastern Canada, magnified the decline in construction."
Both regions have experienced record amounts of rain and severe storms over the past couple of months.
The Canadian economy has been hurt by the slowdown in the United States, brought on by the worldwide credit crunch, which has savaged Canada's export-sensitive forestry and automotive industries, leading to thousands of layoff announcements.
Full story here:Metal fans more prone to mental illness
by Elizabeth Bromstein
"Jazz fans struggle with social acceptance, usually settling down as misfits and 'loners.' Rap fans are also keen on theft, violence and anger, according to the study." I know! Me neither!
Today’s Court of Appeal decision in R. v. Nesbeth, 2008 ONCA 579 provides a good summary of when police may detain an individual for investigatory purposes.
[13] In R. v. Mann (2004), 185 C.C.C. (3d) 308 at para. 16, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that “police officers must be empowered to respond quickly, effectively, and flexibly to the diversity of encounters experienced daily on the front lines of policing”. This is a classic case of police officers faced with a rapidly evolving situation to which they attempted to respond quickly and effectively. In Mann, the court recognized a limited power of investigative detention to assist police in carrying out their duties in circumstances such as this. A police officer may briefly detain an individual for investigative purposes “if there are reasonable grounds to suspect in all the circumstances that the individual is connected to a particular crime and that such a detention is necessary”: at para. 45. Such a detention will not violate s. 9. In this case, the trial judge found that when the police initiated the chase and gave the respondent the command to stop, they did not have the requisite reasonable grounds to detain and therefore violated his rights.