Psychologists' College rejected Whitby man's PhD, court hears Newsdurhamregion.com - Jeff Mitchell - 1 hour ago Greg Carter was accepted as a psychological associate in 2000, but the College of Psychologists of Ontario withheld a designation of psychologist because of concerns over his academic credentials, the College's registrar testified. ...
Here is what the Registrar of the CPO told the court today: "Carter was aware of limitations placed on his practice -- he was not allowed to communicate diagnoses -- and that he did not appeal a College decision to impose the restriction."
And here is what Yarrow told Justice Goudge at the Inquiry:
February 20, 2008
If we find complaints about substandard 12 assessments or opinions, where there's a question of 13 competence or simply not meeting appropriate standards 14 we're more likely to address that in a remedial kind of 15 way, whereas if there seems to be more of a concern about 16 competence of unwilling -- or not competence -- rather 17 compliance, or conduct, or unwillingness to recognise 18 limitations on the individual's competence or 19 appreciation of the standards, then we might deal with 20 that rather differently.
So why was Carter given only a three month suspension for having intentionally and repeatedly failed to comply with a CPO practice restriction and in the process - taint several child custody cases?
Look who is back in the press:
ReplyDeletePsychologists' College rejected Whitby man's PhD, court hears
Newsdurhamregion.com - Jeff Mitchell - 1 hour ago
Greg Carter was accepted as a psychological associate in 2000, but the College of Psychologists of Ontario withheld a designation of psychologist because of concerns over his academic credentials, the College's registrar testified. ...
Hi Mr. Morton,
ReplyDeleteHere is what the Registrar of the CPO told the court today:
"Carter was aware of limitations placed on his practice -- he was not allowed to communicate diagnoses -- and that he did not appeal a College decision to impose the restriction."
And here is what Yarrow told Justice Goudge at the Inquiry:
February 20, 2008
If we find complaints about substandard
12 assessments or opinions, where there's a question of
13 competence or simply not meeting appropriate standards
14 we're more likely to address that in a remedial kind of
15 way, whereas if there seems to be more of a concern about
16 competence of unwilling -- or not competence -- rather
17 compliance, or conduct, or unwillingness to recognise
18 limitations on the individual's competence or
19 appreciation of the standards, then we might deal with
20 that rather differently.
So why was Carter given only a three month suspension for having intentionally and repeatedly failed to comply with a CPO practice restriction and in the process - taint several child custody cases?
Wow.
ReplyDeleteA three month suspension would seem quite inadequate
Wow.
ReplyDeleteA three month suspension would seem quite inadequate
Wow.
ReplyDeleteA three month suspension would seem quite inadequate