Wednesday, April 13, 2016

Reasonable Doubt

Anyone charged with a criminal offence in Canada is presumed to be innocent.  That is just a fancy way of saying that the prosecution must prove someone charged with a crime is guilty.  If the prosecution does not prove someone is guilty that case against them fails and they must be acquitted.


What proving someone guilty means is not immediately obvious.  It could mean it is more likely than not that they committed the crime.  Or it could mean they very likely did commit the crime.  Or it could mean there is no reasonable doubt but they committed the crime.  In Canada the last of those possibilities is what the prosecution must show.


To be found guilty of a crime, the prosecution must show proof of guilt to beyond a reasonable doubt. This means that the Court must be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty. The standard of "reasonable doubt" consists of a doubt based on reason and common sense which must be logically based upon the evidence or lack of evidence. It is not based on sympathy or prejudice. 


Proof beyond a reasonable doubt does not involve proof to an absolute certainty; it is not proof beyond any doubt nor is it an imaginary or frivolous doubt. The burden of proof much closer to absolute certainty than to a balance of probabilities.  The standard is more than proof that the accused is probably guilty in which case the Court must acquit.


Each crime has specific elements that must be proven.  The prosecution must prove each of these elements to beyond reasonable doubt.  So, in a murder case the prosecution must show, among other things, that someone is dead and that the accused is responsible for the death.  It would be an odd murder case where there is any issue over someone being dead but nevertheless that is something that must be proven to beyond reasonable doubt or admitted by the defendant.


An example may help explain what all this means. 


Nothing in the life is ever absolutely certain. 


Even if ten people saw me hitting my brother it is possible they were all mistaken or perhaps I have an evil twin who really did the beating.  Perhaps all ten people were suffering from a delusion and saw nothing.  All that could be true but, of course, to believe that would be fanciful.  To doubt my guilt would not be reasonable.


A reasonable doubt is a doubt that is reasonable – meaning it is a doubt based on evidence (or a lack of evidence).  So, if I were to claim that the ten witnesses who saw me beating up my brother were suffering a delusion and there was no evidence supporting that claim I should be found guilty.  But if I showed, say, that the beating supposedly took place at a party and there were bad drugs used by some or all of the ten witnesses I might be acquitted.


Defences must have an air of reality to have any viability.  If I want to argue I was too drunk, say, to intend to kill someone (that's a defence to murder) it's not enough to say "maybe I was drunk";  I have to show something the could show I was drinking and therefore was drunk.  For there to be reasonable doubt there needs to be something that legitimately gives the Court pause.

 

3 comments:

Unknown said...

ugg boots, timberland, michael kors, hogan, ray ban pas cher, hermes, new balance pas cher, burberry outlet online, north face, coach outlet, kate spade handbags, sac guess, lacoste pas cher, nike roshe, true religion jeans, nike blazer, hollister pas cher, oakley pas cher, ugg boots, true religion jeans, michael kors outlet, coach purses, tn pas cher, ralph lauren uk, nike air max, michael kors outlet, michael kors outlet, lululemon, nike air max, michael kors outlet, coach outlet, hollister, north face, michael kors, michael kors outlet, ray ban uk, mulberry, abercrombie and fitch, nike air max, replica handbags, vanessa bruno, true religion jeans, vans pas cher, nike free run uk, burberry, converse pas cher, michael kors, michael kors, true religion outlet, air force

Unknown said...

herve leger, timberland boots, giuseppe zanotti, iphone cases, insanity workout, mac cosmetics, reebok shoes, hollister, bottega veneta, vans shoes, soccer shoes, gucci, mont blanc, new balance, soccer jerseys, nike roshe, babyliss, converse, valentino shoes, ray ban, jimmy choo shoes, birkin bag, north face outlet, nike air max, baseball bats, nike air max, hollister, louboutin, nike trainers, instyler, ralph lauren, chi flat iron, hollister, ferragamo shoes, vans, nfl jerseys, converse outlet, mcm handbags, nike huarache, celine handbags, p90x workout, wedding dresses, abercrombie and fitch, north face outlet, longchamp, lululemon, ghd, oakley, asics running shoes, beats by dre

Unknown said...

canada goose uk, louis vuitton, swarovski, thomas sabo, canada goose outlet, doudoune canada goose, supra shoes, links of london, karen millen, moncler, sac louis vuitton pas cher, pandora jewelry, ugg,ugg australia,ugg italia, hollister, wedding dresses, juicy couture outlet, canada goose, moncler, barbour jackets, marc jacobs, pandora charms, toms shoes, pandora charms, bottes ugg, coach outlet, montre pas cher, canada goose outlet, louis vuitton, moncler, louis vuitton, ugg pas cher, ugg boots uk, barbour, lancel, pandora jewelry, moncler, louis vuitton, moncler, swarovski crystal, juicy couture outlet, canada goose, moncler outlet, canada goose, moncler, replica watches, ugg,uggs,uggs canada, canada goose, moncler