tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4937285970642106606.post3584514566208805232..comments2024-03-29T03:15:53.198-04:00Comments on Morton's Musings: It is dangerous to ignore repeated letters of counselJames C Mortonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15997892627068235554noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4937285970642106606.post-13626650603995383142012-05-21T08:44:00.782-04:002012-05-21T08:44:00.782-04:00Interesting comment, but wouldn't those letter...Interesting comment, but wouldn't those letters be settlement privileged? The concept worries me. If counsel sends me a letter, and I reply in a manner she not like, am I now obliged to spend my client's money sending further replies every time she sends me the same request? There are already too many lawyers who try to create an evidentiary record through the sending of countless letters. Having the Court of Appeal implicitly endorse that tactic is not a good direction, I fear.Anonymoushttp://www.woodwhitegold.canoreply@blogger.com