Speaker's Corner: Time to kill Mr. Big?

From the Law Times

Full story here:

http://www.lawtimesnews.com/200911165802/Commentary/Speaker-s-Corner-Time-to-kill-Mr-Big

By James Morton | Publication Date: Monday, 16 November 2009

The criminal justice system exists to convict and punish the guilty. But convicting the innocent creates two failures: someone is unjustly punished and, almost as importantly, a criminal goes free.
...
The Kyle Unger case is just the latest example of an innocent man freed after a wrongful conviction and years in prison. He was convicted of the brutal sex slaying of a teenager at a rock concert, a killing that now seems likely to have been committed by someone who told the RCMP Unger was the culprit.

What went wrong? How could the courts convict the wrong man?

There was some mischaracterized physical evidence; for example, a hair supposed to be from Unger wasn't his.

...
What convicted Unger was a confession that, in hindsight, was clearly false and one police obtained in a highly questionable fashion.

That's where the problem arises. Unger's confession was the result of a notorious investigative method, the Mr. Big technique.

In a Mr. Big operation, undercover police pretend to be members of a criminal gang. They befriend a suspect, whom they offer to let join the gang by promising enticements such as money, drugs or sex.

Eventually, they introduce the suspect to the fake head of the supposed gang, Mr. Big. Mr. Big then demands a confession to some serious crime in order to prove the suspect is worthy of joining the gang. That's where the confession comes in. In Unger's case, the technique led to the evidence that convicted him.
...
But such evidence can be unreliable. Almost by definition, the confessions come from desperate people who are bragging. Without some corroboration, such as information that only the real killer would know, they are next to worthless.

Obviously, it's easy to blame people like Unger for making a false confession as he was trying to join a criminal gang. But even if there is some fault on Unger, the Mr. Big technique allows the real criminal to escape justice and, perhaps, to kill again.

Moreover, confessions, no matter how they come about, receive great weight even by educated people. I teach a course on evidence at Osgoode Hall Law School, where almost every year students, on hearing some confessions aren't admissible, say they can't even imagine that they're false. But the effect of letting a jury hear a confession is overwhelming.
...

Police must have the freedom to use a broad range of investigative techniques. Mr. Big is one that can work but only where it leads to hard evidence directly linking the suspect to the crime.

...

James Morton is a lawyer with Steinberg Morton Hope & Israel LLP and a past president of the Ontario Bar Association who teaches evidence at Osgoode Hall Law School.
James Morton
1100-5255 Yonge Street
Toronto, Ontario
M2N 6P4

416 225 2777