If anything the decision is more careful than Raham. It will be hard to overturn on appeal.
Drutz is not available online but I have a scan I can email to whoever asks.
James Morton
1100-5255 Yonge Street
Toronto, Ontario
M2N 6P4
416 225 2777
If anything the decision is more careful than Raham. It will be hard to overturn on appeal.
Drutz is not available online but I have a scan I can email to whoever asks.
James Morton
1100-5255 Yonge Street
Toronto, Ontario
M2N 6P4
416 225 2777
3 comments:
Is it a long decision? I'd sure like to see it. jamesbowie1983 at hotmail dot com.
Is it because the absence of any subjective test of mens rea is a violation of funadmental justice, as in Vaillancourt? Just a guess.
This is great news, on top of the Raham decision, and thank you for sharing it.
To make it easier on Mr. Morton, the case has since been reported and is available at: http://www.canlii.org/en/on/oncj/doc/2009/2009oncj537/2009oncj537.html
Post a Comment