Unreasonable verdict

Today’s decision in R. v. Duvivier, 2010 ONCA 136 provides :

 

[3]              The appellant does not challenge the well-established test for an unreasonable verdict.  That test, as set out by the Supreme Court in R. v. Biniaris (2000), 143 C.C.C. (3d) 1, is whether, on all the evidence, the verdict is one that “a properly instructed jury acting judicially could reasonably have reached”.