Father Raymond J. de Souza: Autumn Kelly's cavalier conversion

"The continued anti-Catholic legislation in the Act of Settlement 1701 is a disgrace and a shame on Canada. That said, and here I disagree with Father Raymond, Ms. Kelly is right to suggest the Anglican Church is the same religion as the Catholic Church. Perhaps not as true to its founding principles (but who am I to say, being a member of neither Church). Still, having read the Pope's two most recent letters my sense is that a profound Catholic (as the Anglican Church claims to be) sensibility will be favorably inclined to Rome. jcm"

Father Raymond J. De Souza

The usual manner of leaving the Catholic Church is to drift away, without making any public pronouncement of it. So it is noteworthy when it happens, and more so if one does it in order to conform with the constitution of Canada.

The lady in question is one Autumn Kelly of Montreal who will marry, the day after the tomorrow, the Queens eldest grandchild, Mr. Peter Phillips. When Mr. Phillips was born 30 years ago, his mother, Princess Anne, and her then-husband, Captain Mark Phillips, declined a royal title for their children, so Mr. Phillips is very much a commoner. Indeed, so common as to have sold exclusive pre-nuptial photographs and an interview to Hello! magazine for some $1-million. At the same time, he is not so common as to want to sacrifice his place in the line of succession for the woman he loves. So Miss Kelly has abandoned her Roman Catholicism and become a member of the Church of England.

Its not clear what Mr. Phillips is preserving. Barring a Nepal-style massacre of the entire royal family, he has no plausible chance of ever becoming king, standing now 11th in the queue. So for his bride to trade her religion for a non-existent prospect of royal preferment seems, well, shallow.

"In my eyes, it is, after all, the same religion," Miss Kelly explained to Hello!. One does not expect either great theological or historical literacy from Hello!, but even then the statement reveals not mere shallowness, but deep ignorance. Miss Kelly was baptized at St. John Fisher parish in Montreal, named after the Catholic bishop beheaded by King Henry VIII. Neither king nor bishop thought the differences Henry was effecting in the Church were inconsequential.

The decision is odder still given recent contrary precedents. Prince Michael of Kent (the Queens first cousin) gave up his place to marry a Catholic, and Lord Nicholas Windsor, son of the Duke and Duchess of Kent, converted to Catholicism himself in 2001. In 2006, he got married at the Vatican, the first royal to do so since the Reformation.

The most senior Catholic royal is the Duchess of Kent, who converted in 1994. The 1701 Act of Settlement, which bars Catholics and those who marry Catholics from the line of succession says nothing about marrying non-Catholics who subsequently convert, so her husband, the Duke of Kent, kept his place. I remember being at Westminster cathedral in 1996 for Easter services when, just a few minutes ahead of time, the Duchess of Kent arrived for Mass. There was a palpable sense of the historical moment.

While it cannot be denied that the British and Canadian Crown is, constitutionally speaking, a thoroughgoing anti-Catholic institution, it has long since ceased to be so practically speaking. I support the monarchical principle, and am not terribly troubled by the exclusion of Catholics. Indeed, given that it is possible to marry a witch, but not a Catholic, and remain eligible for the Crown, the exclusion sets us apart somehow, as if to acknowledge that Catholicism is something to be taken seriously. And it must be added that given the total hash the Queens children have made of their marriages, one is almost grateful that they are not Catholics -- the Monaco royals have created enough trouble on that score for the Vatican.

The cavalier conversion of Miss Kelly does symbolize that the Queens children and grandchildren are more religiously indifferent than defenders of the faith. It was some years ago that the Prince of Wales mused that he would like to be a "defender of faith" in general, rather than "of the faith" in the Anglican sense. More recently there have been indications that upon becoming king he would prefer a multi-faith coronation service. And it must be said that Prince Charles himself seems to take religion more seriously than most of the others.

All of which make Miss Kellys decision even more disappointing. If she had decided to convert because she had become convinced of the truths that the Anglican Church teaches, that could be an admirable act. But to change ones beliefs in order to preserve ones standing in a family which appears increasingly indifferent to religion altogether seems an act more fitting to knaves than nobles.

James Morton
1100 - 5255 Yonge Street
Toronto, Ontario
M2N 6P4