This clip from the Globe shows two things.
First, the Conservatives have no respect for the law and second the Conservatives have no respect for the law.
Challenging minimum sentences is not "soft on crime" any more than suggesting there are problems with the medical system suggests being "soft on disease". The Bloc may be wrong but they are not child molsters or supporters of child molesting. They hold a position in good faith and it is worth debate on the merits. The law (and the justice system) deserves a substantive discussion -- the Conservatives have too little respect for the justice system to do that.
I had considerable respect for the Conservative justice program initially -- perhaps I didn't agree with it but it was a serious attempt to revisit a broken system and I was ready to be convinced it was right, or worth a try. That respect is gone.
Second, the ten percenters. What an outrage! When I worked with a Liberal MP in a held riding we were very very careful not to cross a line into political material. Maybe there were Liberals who were less careful but this stuff is Conservative Party mailings at the expense of tax dollars. The contempt for the law shown by this behavior is breathtaking.
A pervert in a plaid shirt is luring a child in a park, but the Bloc Québécois will not do anything to stop him, the Conservative Party says in a new round of attack ads.
The message, which was sent at taxpayers' expense in every single Bloc riding, features a blurry picture of a small boy leaving a park with an older man. The two are walking hand-in-hand, and a nearby kiddy swing is empty.
“Your Bloc MP has voted against the protection of children,” the tag line states.
Controversial Conservative ad blasting the Bloc Quebecois position on crime
The hard-hitting Conservative campaign aims to highlight the fact the Bloc was the only party last April that voted against a bill imposing minimum sentences for the trafficking of children, in matters such as prostitution rings.
“The Bloc prefers sweet deals for criminals. That's unacceptable,” the Conservative campaign states.
Law-and-order issues are rarely at the centre of political debate in Quebec, but the Conservatives argue that Quebeckers are as concerned as other Canadians about crimes against children.
“What we are denouncing is the fact that the Bloc is voting against the values of Quebeckers,” Conservative MP Steven Blaney said in an interview. He represents a riding just south of Quebec City.
The Conservative Party used a controversial method to distribute the ads, relying on each MP's ability to send out free mail to 10 per cent of the addresses in a riding.
The rules state that the pamphlet's contents must relate to parliamentary functions and cannot refer to coming elections. But the Conservatives have raised eyebrows in Parliament by issuing hard-hitting partisan pamphlets in opposition ridings.
In this case, the carpet-bombing of the 48 Bloc ridings was sponsored by Conservative MPs in and outside Quebec.
Bill C-268 proposes “minimum sentence for offences involving trafficking of persons under the age of eighteen years,” and has been championed by Conservative MP Joy Smith. It was approved at second reading in April by a vote of 232-47, and will now be studied by the justice committee of the House.
The Bloc explains that it voted against Bill C-268 because it prevents judges from exercising their discretion.
“Minimum sentences have no dissuasive effect,” said Bloc MP and whip Michel Guimond.
Mr. Guimond said the use of parliamentary resources to send out the ads is despicable. “It's just unbelievable, saying that we are against the protection of children … and are almost condoning these types of abuses,” he said.
The Conservatives defended the practice and the content of the ads, saying that it was a reflection of a clear vote in Parliament.
4 comments:
This should not come as any shock. The Conservatives do not even follow laws they themselves introduced.
These conservatives could never live within the law. They can never be trusted.
Quebec has daycare. Nuff said.
Saying more: in the last election the Liberal platform was a direct tranfer of over $1B/yr to these often at risk toddlers, the NDP nearly twice as much. Cons about $30M/yr.
AB's retarded Provincial government claims a stay-at-home parent is the way to go (blind that Con policies and globalization has killed middle class income everywhere without oil revenues): in the late 1980s I was the only one in my class with divorced parents. A decade later, the majority of my classmates lacked a nuclear family.
Cons, Adler, Sunmedia, Macleans, CTV, BCE, Canwest, the Metis Federation, AB, SK, MB, Interior BC, NB; all care about raping prisoners and making rich people richer more than the well-being of young children. I really hope our Right is right about god: they'll probably go to Hell.
Post a Comment