Tuesday, March 30, 2010

Summary judgment not available in Small Claims Court

The Court of Appeal rarely rules on Small Claims Court matters, however, today in Van de Vrande v. Butkowsky, 2010 ONCA 230, the Court ruled that Summary Judgment is not available in Small Claims Court. That said, the Court held that motions to strike, as structured in the Small Claims Court rules serve a similar but not identical purpose.

The Court held:

1) Availability of a Motion for Summary Judgment


[8] With respect to the availability of a motion for summary judgment, the appellant argues that such a motion can be read into the Small Claims Court Rules. He argues that the absence of explicit reference to such a motion in the Small Claim Court Rules is a gap. In attempting to fill this gap, he refers to r. 1.03(2), which reads as follows:

If these rules do not cover a matter adequately, the court may give directions and make any order that is just, and the practice shall be decided by analogy to these rules, by reference to the Courts of Justice Act and the Act governing the action and, if the court considers it appropriate, by reference to the Rules of Civil Procedure.

[9] In arguing for the availability of a motion for summary judgment, the appellant emphasizes s. 25 of the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, which provides that Small Claims Court should proceed in a summary manner. He therefore argues that, pursuant to r. 1.03(2) of the Small Claims Court Rules and s. 25 of the Courts of Justice Act, r. 12.02 should be read broadly, as allowing a motion for summary judgment. With respect to the applicable test, he argues that reference should be had to r. 76.07 (since repealed on January 1, 2010) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, which governs motions for summary judgment under the simplified procedure, and allows a motion judge to make findings of fact.

[10] The respondent argues that such motions are not available under the Small Claims Court Rules. He submits that the silence of the Small Claims Court Rules is a deliberate omission, not a gap to be filled. In the respondent's view, a motion for summary judgment is as foreign to the proceedings of the Small Claims Court as examinations for discovery and not to be read into the Small Claims Court Rules. In the respondent's view, both the motion judge and Divisional Court erred in applying tests for motions for summary judgment to a r. 12.02 motion.

[11] In my view, the Divisional Court erred in applying the jurisprudence and principles emanating from r. 20 of the Rules of Civil Procedure. This rule deals with a summary judgment motion in an action that is brought in Superior Court pursuant to the rules that apply to that court. I do not view the failure to provide for summary judgment motions as a gap in the Small Claims Court Rules, but rather a deliberate omission. It is not up to the court to read in such a provision, particularly in light of the fact that r. 12.02 specifically addresses the ability to bring a motion in the nature of those contemplated by rr. 20, 21 and 76 Rules of civil Procedure. If a motion for summary judgment of the kind provided for in r. 20 is to be created, it is a matter for the Rules Committee and not the courts.

[12] The error may in part result from the appellant's motion having been framed as seeking an order for "summary judgment" rather than an order to "strike out" the respondents claim pursuant to r. 12.02.

[13] In my view it is neither useful nor appropriate to apply the jurisprudence emanating from the application of rr. 20 and 76 of the Rules of Civil Procedure to assist in the interpretation of r. 12.02 of the Small Claims Court Rules.

[14] Rule 12.02 of the Small Claims Court Rules allows a party to bring a motion to strike a document, including a claim, before trial. It is therefore more akin to a r. 21 motion than a r. 20 motion. It is, however, worded differently than any of rr. 20, 21, or 76 of the Rules of Civil Procedure.

[15] Rule 12.02 of the Small Claims Court Rules reads as follows:

12.02(1) The court may, on motion, strike out or amend all or part of any document that,

(a) discloses no reasonable cause of action or defence;

(b) may delay or make it difficult to have a fair trial; or

(c) is inflammatory, a waste of time, a nuisance or an abuse of the court's process.

(2) In connection with an order striking out or amending a document under subrule (1), the court may do one or more of the following:

1. In the case of a claim, order that the action be stayed or dismissed,

2. In the case of a defence, strike out the defence and grant judgment.

3. Impose such terms as are just.

[16] In contrast, r. 21 of the Rules of Civil Procedure reads in relevant part as follows:

21.01(1) A party may move before a judge,

...

(b) to strike out a pleading on the ground that it discloses no reasonable cause of action or defence,

(2) No evidence is admissible on a motion,

...

(b) under clause (1)(b).

(3) A defendant may move before a judge to have an action stayed or dismissed on the ground that,

...

(d) the action is frivolous or vexatious or is otherwise an abuse of the process of the court,

and the judge may make an order or grant judgment accordingly.

[17] There are several important differences between r. 21.01 of the Rules of Civil Procedure and r. 12.02 of the Small Claims Court Rules. First, where a rule 21 motion can be brought to strike a pleading, a r. 12.02 motion can be brought to strike any document. Second, the prohibition on admitting evidence contained in r. 21.01(2) is absent from r. 12.02. Third, where r. 21.01(3) allows an action to be struck on the very narrow grounds of its being frivolous, vexatious, or an abuse of process, r. 12.02(1)(c) adds the criteria of inflammatory, waste of time, and nuisance.

[18] Further, r. 12.02 applies in a somewhat different context than the Rules of Civil Procedure. Section 25 of the Courts of Justice Act, provides that in Small Claims Court proceedings the court is to "hear and determine in a summary way all questions of law and fact." The court can make "such order as is considered just and agreeable to good conscience". In addition, r. 1.03(1) of the Small Claims Court Rules, provides that the rules shall be "liberally construed to secure the just, most expeditious and least expensive determination of every proceeding on its merit in accordance with s. 25 of the Courts of Justice Act."

[19] Conceptually, I view r. 12.02 as being situated somewhere between the rules 20 and 21 of the Rules of Civil Procedure. It is not a summary judgment motion involving extensive affidavits and a requirement such as contemplated in r. 20 of the Rules of Civil Procedure where the responding party must put his "best foot forward". It is more akin to a r. 21 motion, although it is worded more broadly and does not have the same prohibition on the filing of affidavit evidence. It is a motion that is brought in the spirit of the summary nature of Small Claims Court proceedings and involves an analysis of whether a reasonable cause of action has been disclosed or whether the proceeding should be ended at an early stage because its continuation would be "inflammatory", a "waste of time" or a "nuisance."

[20] In my view, the references to actions that are inflammatory, a waste of time, or a nuisance was intended to lower the very high threshold set by r. 21.01(3)(d)'s reference to actions that are frivolous, vexatious, or an abuse of process.

[21] It bears remembering that r. 12.02 motions will often be brought and responded to by self-represented litigants who lack the extensive training of counsel. The test to be applied on such a motion ought to reflect this, and avoid the somewhat complex case law that has fleshed out the Rules of Civil Procedure.

23 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hi there! I know this is somewhat off topic but I was wondering which blog platform are you using for this website?
I'm getting sick and tired of Wordpress because I've had
issues with hackers and I'm looking at alternatives for another platform. I would be awesome if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.

my web blog: bankruptcy in florida

Anonymous said...

Hi there! I know this is somewhat off topic but I was wondering which blog
platform are you using for this website? I'm getting sick and tired of Wordpress because I've had issues with
hackers and I'm looking at alternatives for another platform. I would be awesome if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.

My site - bankruptcy in florida
my site - bankruptcy attorney florida

Anonymous said...

Thank you a lot for sharing this with all folks you actually understand what you're speaking approximately! Bookmarked. Please additionally visit my web site =). We may have a link exchange arrangement between us

Visit my blog; online roulette

Anonymous said...

Do you have a spam issue on this website; I also am a blogger,
and I was curious about your situation; we have developed some nice methods and we are looking to trade techniques with others, be sure to shoot me an
e-mail if interested.

Take a look at my site; cws corporate housing dallas

Anonymous said...

Your blog seems to be having some compatibilty issues in my firefox browser.
The wording appears to be running off the page pretty bad.

If you want you can e-mail me at: shaunabarney@gmx.de and I'll shoot you over a screenshot of the problem.

Look at my web blog :: furnished rentals vancouver west end

Anonymous said...

You are welcome Patty. Thanks for dropping in and
I hope you keep returning for more functional suggestions and tech details.
And remember to inform your buddies!

Take a look at my site :: opisglobal.com

Anonymous said...

You are splendid. I have actually been so distressed.

Thanks, thank you, thanks.
Patty.

My site: xerox phaser 8560 drivers

Anonymous said...

When I initially commented I clicked the "Notify me when new remarks are included"
checkbox and now eachtime a comment is included I get many e-mails with thesame comment.
Is there any way you can delete me from that service?

Thank you!

Take a look at my site: http://newsalfemminile.it/-/cronaca/anticipazioni-uomini-e-donne-sfilata-elga-oggi-e-andata-In-onda-unaltra-puntata-del-trono-over-con-le-sfilate-30119.html/comment-page-75

Anonymous said...

Wow that's a great deal work ! Thank u for sharing, it's cool to discover the behind the scenes process!


Here is my website; ,cheap earrings for Sensitive ears

Anonymous said...

Can be accomplished exactly similarly Gary ... if you are discussing the tearable kind from Avery.

Personal cards are a little more difficult and also
depend on the paper taking care of potentials of your specific printer.


Feel free to visit my site; Xerox Phaser 8560 Maintenance Kit

Anonymous said...

cost-free download vista vehicle driver.

my weblog; http://nicedigs.blogspot.com/2009/04/latest-Dirtaprmay-09.html

Anonymous said...

I enjoy the Bird over a Scroll earrings, as well as Scroll and Heart earrings:-)

Here is my weblog ... cyberonlinebiz.com

Anonymous said...

It helped my Samsung ML-1210. Thanks. I will get a new printer as a result of Home windows 8.


Take a look at my weblog: Www.wrestlingcampguide.Com

Anonymous said...

Thanks-a-mundo with the blog article.Much thank you.
Will continue reading...

My blog: ,cheap earrings uk

Anonymous said...

Great post. I was checking constantly this weblog and I am impressed!

Very helpful information particularly the last phase I take
care of such
info much. I was seeking this particular info for a long time.

Thank you and good luck.

Review my blog: LG 42ls5600 TV

Anonymous said...

Hey. I was contemplating adding a backlink back to your site since both of our websites are based mostly around the same topic.
Would you prefer I link to you using your site address: http://www.
blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4937285970642106606&postID=3222602310433708478 or web site title: Blogger:
Morton's Musings. Please let me know at your earliest convenience. Thanks

Feel free to visit my homepage :: refrigerator repair

Anonymous said...

Hello there! My wife and I frequently publish guest
articles for other blog owners to help increase exposure to our work, as well as provide excellent articles to weblog owners.
It's a win win situation! If you're interested feel free to e-mail me at: nicolas.
mcculloch@gmail.com so we may talk further.

Thanks!

Also visit my page ... 24 hour appliance repair

Anonymous said...

Although I was capable of disable the mobile site, I appreciate your quick response
in removing it. Your standard site downloads quickly and is very intuitive.
Thanks!

Here is my web page ... Bangles (danon-jewellery.livejournal.com)

Anonymous said...

Download file configuration HP LaserJet P1005.

Look into my web-site: xerox phaser 8560 toner (http://ontublog.blogspot.fr/2009/09/greek-letters-in-gnuplot.html?m=1)

Anonymous said...

Hey! I know this is kind of off topic but I was wondering which blog platform are you using for
this website? I'm getting tired of Wordpress because I've had issues with hackers and I'm looking at options for another platform. I would be awesome if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.

my web site: hultquist jewellery australia - -

Anonymous said...

his jobs are extraordinary. wow.
can't pick just one single thing i'm keen on.


my web blog - wholesale silver jewellery - -

Anonymous said...

The all circuit in this websites is really intereting i attempt
it Im additionally a B. e(electronics)pupil this website is
really great.

Stop by my webpage - xerox phaser 8560 - -

Anonymous said...

hp laserjet 1020 drivers supports Windows XP. The HP 1020 LaserJet is a great.


my website; xerox phaser 8560 maintenance kit