See R v Little, 2009 CanLII 41212 (Ont.S.C.J.), at paras. 149-150:
If the police wished to examine the information stored in the Treo [cellphone], they should have applied for a warrant authorizing the search of its contents. The Treo was safely in their possession. There was no urgency to search its contents, nor were there other circumstances that made it impracticable to obtain judicial authorization for the search. The police search of the contents of the Treo violated Mr. Little's s. 8 rights.
No comments:
Post a Comment