Sunday, July 11, 2010

Does this sound familiar?

"The Republicans turned a US$237-billion surplus that Bill Clinton left into a US$1.3-trillion deficit. And they're running on the same policies."

The Martin government ran surpluses -- but the Liberal Party is accused of being "tax and spend" -- as the Conservatives rack of deficits into the foreseeable future.
All that said, and despite the fiscal prudence of Clinton, Obama will still be demolished come the November mid-term elections.

In fairness, I think the anticipated Democratic collapse is not entirely because of the economy -- just about everyone everywhere did a huge stimulus package.

But the perception of Republicans as being better with money will be a factor.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Bill Clinton was directly responsible for forcing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, through legislation, to issue "sub-prime" mortgages to people who really couldn't afford them...and this, in turn, contributed directly to the crash of the American economy.

CanadianSense said...

that $ 56 billion taken fron E.I. used in general revenue went a long way in helping balancing the books.

The $ 25 Billion in cuts to Education, Health and Social Services also helped.

Not sure how Liberals are portrayed as a party of the centre or compassionate.


Foreign Aid was actually cut under Chretien-Martin.

In 2005 the Liberals opened the taps and started to offer to fix the funding cuts they made earlier.