Issue on Appeal
· Can a cross-claim for contribution and indemnity exist when the person from whom contribution is sought is no longer liable in law to the plaintiff because the plaintiff's claim against that person is statute barred? Or is it sufficient that that person was potentially liable to the plaintiff at one time?
… .
[24] Reading the relevant sections together, a claim for contribution and indemnity, whether in tort or otherwise, now has a two-year limitation period that is presumed to run from the date when the person who seeks contribution and indemnity is served with the plaintiff's claim that gives rise to its claim over. This is the only limitation period in the Act that applies to claims for contribution and indemnity. The previous limitation period provision that applied where the plaintiff's limitation period against other concurrent tortfeasors had expired, s. 8 of the Negligence Act, is repealed by the Limitations Act, 2002.
3 comments:
OMG This is really really BORING
That's one reason why I now always ask plaintiff's counsel to give me a copy of their affidavit of service of the original Statement of Claim on my client right off the bat - I want to know exactly how much time I have left to start a Third Party Claim or Crossclaim.
I've had files where the claims handler/adjuster that I ultimately end up reporting to has sat on the Statement of Claim for months, and in some cases, more than a year after it has been served, before retaining me, as they're trying to settle the claim themselves.
I've had to remind them that any claim for contrib & indem will die off for good 2 years after the S of C is served, regardless of whether or not the plaintiff has demanded a Statement of Defence from them.
It's the little things that can trip up even the best of us sometimes - and then LawPro has to be brought into the picture...
Thanks Jason -- missing a limitation period is anything but boring!!!
Post a Comment