Tuesday, April 19, 2011

"The economic policy (approved here) follows the principle that only socialism can preserve the victories of the revolution"

Well, no.

This is the beginning of the end of communism/socialism in Cuba.

That's a good thing because a (properly regulated) capitalist economy does offer the most liberty and growth.

But of course capitalism is compatible with dreadful oppression (look to China). One can only hope that Cuba, which has a sophisticated and well-educated people, moves to being a free nation and not just a place you can own land:


Castro resigns, sweeping economic changes come to Cuba
 
Paul Haven      
Associated Press     
 
HAVANA — A day after Cuban media revealed that a Communist Party summit had approved sweeping economic changes and elected a new leadership — without saying what the changes were or who is now in charge — Cubans hoped to get details in a closing speech by President Raul Castro on Tuesday.
...
Fidel Castro formally resigned from the Communist Part leadership, Monday, paving the way for his brother who he has been handing power over to since 2006.

...
Delegates approved about 300 economic proposals in an unanimous vote Monday — including a measure that apparently recommends the legalization the buying and selling of private property.

Also on the table was a proposal to eventually eliminate the monthly ration book, which provides Cubans with a basic basket of heavily subsidized food and other goods. Other measures covered seed capital for would-be entrepreneurs and eliminating the island's unique dual-currency system.

"The economic policy (approved here) follows the principle that only socialism can preserve the victories of the revolution," said Marino Murillo, an ex-economy minister who has been put in charge of implementing the reforms.

1 comment:

Kirbycairo said...

The problem is that the oppression and exploitation that you obvious recognize that can be associated with capitalism is most difficult for less developed nations to resist. Maynard Keynes tried to create a system that would create more international equality but was thwarted by the major powers, the US in particular. The problem for pro-capitalist ideologists is finding a way to solve the problems of globalization today and the negative effects it is having on the 'drive to the bottom.' I think this dilemma is similar to the crises that Capitalism faced in the late 19th and early 20th century as well as in the 1930s. The first dilemma created the Progressive Movement and the second one created the so-called welfare state. So now how does capitalism face the dilemma of globalization??