Poole v. Whirlpool Corporation, 2011 ONCA 808, is a helpful reminder that cross-examination on contentious issues is necessary in summary judgment matters. Bald allegations are not sufficient -- evidence is needed to oppose summary judgment.
The Court holds:
"The appellants elected not to cross-examine the respondent on his affidavit materials, in which he swore that he never agreed to the precondition and was unaware of any reference to it on the appellants' intranet system."
1 comment:
I absolutely love your blog and find the majority of your post's to be exactly what I'm looking for.
Does one offer guest writers to write content for you?
I wouldn't mind producing a post or elaborating on a few of the subjects you write in relation to here. Again, awesome site!
Stop by my web-site :: how much should i weigh for my height and age
Post a Comment