"Voters in Switzerland have rejected a proposal to give themselves more annual leave in a national referendum.
The plan would have given workers six weeks off a year, but business groups warned about the cost to the economy.
In other referendums, voters in Zurich agreed to the creation of "sex boxes" where prostitutes can work. In Geneva, residents voted to tighten restrictions on street protests.
Referendums are a key part of Switzerland's direct democracy system.
The Swiss frequently have their say on changes to laws, budgets, or any issue that 100,000 citizens say they feel strongly about."
So the Swiss get to have their say ion laws, budgets, or any issue where they can get 100 thousand signatures.
But here in Canada, we get none of that.
One vote every four years is not democracy , but rather tyranny.
I think we should look at the Swiss for a better model than what we are forced to lived with here in Canada.
Indeed, and with the internet direct democracy is more practical than ever. I suppose the real question is, would the public take the time to learn the issues or should that be left to representatives -- or, what sort of issues should (or can) be decided by direct democracy?
Your style is very unique compared to other people I have read stuff from. Thanks for posting when you've got the opportunity, Guess I will just book mark this blog.
9 comments:
"Voters in Switzerland have rejected a proposal to give themselves more annual leave in a national referendum.
The plan would have given workers six weeks off a year, but business groups warned about the cost to the economy.
In other referendums, voters in Zurich agreed to the creation of "sex boxes" where prostitutes can work. In Geneva, residents voted to tighten restrictions on street protests.
Referendums are a key part of Switzerland's direct democracy system.
The Swiss frequently have their say on changes to laws, budgets, or any issue that 100,000 citizens say they feel strongly about."
So the Swiss get to have their say ion laws, budgets, or any issue where they can get 100 thousand signatures.
But here in Canada, we get none of that.
One vote every four years is not democracy , but rather tyranny.
I think we should look at the Swiss for a better model than what we are forced to lived with here in Canada.
Indeed, and with the internet direct democracy is more practical than ever. I suppose the real question is, would the public take the time to learn the issues or should that be left to representatives -- or, what sort of issues should (or can) be decided by direct democracy?
Webbed feet communist
"what sort of issues should (or can) be decided by direct democracy?"
ALL OF THEM MORTON... EVERY SINGLE ONE BUDDY.........
The people who pay the bills should be allowed to referendum anything and everything.
Your style is very unique compared to other
people I have read stuff from. Thanks for posting when you've got the opportunity, Guess I will just book mark this blog.
My blog post ... best diet plans for women
supreme t shirt
off-white
kobe shoes
jordan sneakers
air jordan
yeezy 380
stephen curry shoes
nike epic react
kyrie shoes
jordan retro
high quality replica handbags high quality replica handbags replica designer bags
this contentgo to this site have a peek at this web-siteadditional info great post to readofficial website
blog link louis vuitton dolabuy more buy replica bags this hyperlink Ysl replica
Post a Comment