Sam Harris's view on free will is really nothing new. It is merely a secular restatement of the Calvinist concept of double predestination - we are saved or damned without any input from ourselves.
It is, of course, impossible to determine if we have free will or merely think we have free will. The best approach to such questions is to remember, with Lear, 'O, that way madness lies; let me shun that'.
7 comments:
Actually, Harris makes no comment regarding heaven and hell. His thesis rests on the logic and science that our choices are either caused or random, both prospects make free will impossible, and that there is no third option. I do agree, however that Harris is not saying anything that has not been said before, both in psychology and philosophy.
Agreed -- my point is the basic thesis is the same
Agreed -- my point is the basic thesis is the same
zzzzz2018.8.8
dsquared2
oakley sunglasses wholesale
yeezy boost 350
ralph lauren uk
coach outlet online
nike outlet
off white nike
polo lacoste
ugg boots clearance
canada goose outlet
cheap jordans
gucci belts
air max 2019
golden goose sneakers
balenciaga shoes
supreme clothing
supreme clothing
yeezy boost 350
fila shoes
golden goose
websites he has a good point Visit This Link Web Site click this link here now pop over here
b4b62u3p93 k3w05m5i86 w4b64f7n66 o0v37z4c51 b8w21s5m50 k0o27b7h85
Post a Comment