Morton's Musings
Canadian Law and Policy
Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Appellant review of discretionary decisions
Hinke v. Thermal Energy International Inc., 2012 ONCA 635 provides:
[31]
Absent a conclusion that the motion judge was clearly wrong or made an error in law, this court will not interfere with a discretionary decision:
R. v. Chiasson
, 2009 ONCA 789, 258 O.A.C. 50.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Newer Post
Older Post
Home
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment