Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Judge declares part of 2008 Tory omnibus crime bill unconstitutional

This is less of a big deal than it might seem.  Dangerous Offender applications are very rare and regardless of the onus are fought vigorously.  As a practical matter this will make a samll change is a vanishingly small number of cases:

Story here

An Ontario court has declared another plank of the Conservative government’s tough-on-crime agenda unconstitutional.

Ontario Superior Court Judge Alan Bryant struck down a section of the Criminal Code introduced in 2008 dealing with dangerous offenders in a decision published Tuesday.

The ruling comes in a year during which judges in Ontario have already struck down two mandatory minimum firearm penalties from the same “Tackling Violent Crime” omnibus law.

Dangerous offenders — sex killer Paul Bernardo is designated as one — can be given indeterminate sentences and be locked up for life.

What changed in 2008 was that the new provision provided a shortcut of sorts for the Crown in a small subset of cases.

If an offender was convicted three times of a specified violent or sexual crime with sentences of at least two years the burden of proof shifted from the Crown to them.

All the Crown had to prove was that the offender was convicted of those offences and was sentenced to at least two years. The offender then had to try to prove that they did not have a pattern of dangerous behaviour.

That burden is too onerous, lawyer Peter Behr argued — and Judge Bryant agreed.

“(The law) reverses it and puts it on the accused to say, ’You’re real bad and we’re going to put you away, you’re likely to be put away forever, unless you show otherwise,“’ Mr. Behr said in an interview from his office in London, Ont.


The Rat said...

I think the problem is the vanishingly small numbers. How many three time repeat sex offenders don't get the "dangerous offender" tag because it is so difficult and "vigorously argued"? This particular case involved a three time violent rapist, oops sorry, "sexual assaulter". How the hell does he get the chance to commit a second offense let alone a third!!!

Our sentencing regime is disgraceful when a man can get what appears to be a couple of years for a violent sexual assault. Did the judge even consider the potential for future victims after rape #2? And now, constitutionally, it has to be argued vigorously after conviction #3? Thank god he got it anyway or in about 4 years we'd be arguing about victim #4.

The Keystone Garter said...

It is funny. There is a police force that wants an after hours bar. None of them bothered to see if this backfired anywhere else. What happened north of Wpg was a drunk police officer plowed into a woman, like Grand Theft Auto. The bad part was the entire detachment and a good chunk of the WInnipeg police conospired to cover it up. The pig is a free man. One man got conspiracy charges. It should have been dozens. Inbred forces should be paid less money. Keep hassling me. Harper's Morons should be daycre workers.

Anonymous said...

I want to to thank you for this very good read!

! I absolutely loved every bit of it. I've got you saved as a favorite to check out new things you post…

Take a look at my homepage Online Kredit sofortzusage

Anonymous said...

Quality content is the important to interest the viewers to pay a visit the site, that's what this web page is providing.

my blog; florida bad credit mortgage

Anonymous said...

I know this if off topic but I'm looking into starting my own weblog and was wondering what all is needed to get set up? I'm assuming having a blog
like yours would cost a pretty penny? I'm not very internet savvy so I'm not 100% sure. Any recommendations or advice would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks

Look into my web blog: Seo Submission