R. v. A.F., 2012 ONCA 790 is a good source for the proposition that fairlure to give sufficient reasons is an error of law for appeal purposes:
[2] We are, however, satisfied that the reasons are inadequate. The reasons are very brief and do not reveal the basis upon which the trial judge sorted through the conflicting evidence to arrive at his result. The absence of adequate reasons is an error in law.
2 comments:
The belt сoulԁ be worn whereνer so you can get a wοnԁeгful perform out taking a cat nap or washing home.
Reѵiеw my ωeb blog rogontheory.org
The belt could be worn wherever so you can get a fantastic work out
taking a cat nap or washing house.
Here is my site - http://artbrew.co/profile/LenaStrickland
Post a Comment