Sunday, December 9, 2012

Curative proviso in context of serious error in judge alone trial

R. v. Ellis2012 NLCA 75 considers the curative provision of the Criminal Code and holds its application is exceptional:

[17]        The onerous test that is to be applied by this Court when considering the curative proviso in the wake of a serious error in a judge-alone proceeding is outlined in R. v. Pavlov, 2009 NLCA 44 (CanLII), 2009 NLCA 44, 287 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 19 at para. 21:

… As Sopinka J. indicated in S.(P.L.), at para. 43, and the majority confirmed in Khan, at paras. 29-31, once an error as to law has influenced a verdict so as to remove it from the category of "harmless" error, the appropriate inquiry is whether "the evidence is so overwhelming that ­a trier of fact would inevitably convict". [Emphasis added in original.]  The question is whether any trial judge, not the particular judge who heard the case, would inevitably have had to come to the same conclusion as to guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, when the credibility of the accused is properly assessed.

                                               (Underlining in original; italics added.) 

[18]        In Pavlov, Barry J.A. emphasized that the curative proviso could not be applied to serious errors to avoid an order for a new trial unless the evidence adduced was so overwhelming that a conviction was inevitable.   He cited the following reasons of Justice Deschamps for the majority in R. v. Trochym,2008 SCC 7 (CanLII), 2008 SCC 7, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 239 at para. 82, which identified the standard to be met by the Crown before the curative proviso can be invoked:

The instant case is one that falls squarely within the second category of serious errors that would justify a new trial unless the properly adduced evidence is so overwhelming that a conviction is inevitable, or would invariably result.  This standard should not be equated with the ordinary standard in a criminal trial with proof beyond a reasonable doubt.  The application of the proviso to serious errors reflects a higher standard appropriate to appellate review.  The standard applied by appellate court, namely that the evidence against an accused is so overwhelming that conviction is inevitable or would invariably result, is a substantially higher one than the requirement that the Crown prove its case "beyond a reasonable doubt" at trial.  This higher standard reflects the fact that it is difficult for an appellate court, in particular when considering a jury trial, since no detailed findings of fact will have been made, to consider retroactively the effect that, for example, excluding certain evidence could reasonably have had on the outcome.

                                                                             (Emphasis added.)

[19]        Barry J.A. also addressed the particular concerns relating to cases on appeal turning on credibility.  He wrote at paragraph 17 of Pavlov:

Where credibility is critical for the issue of reasonable doubt, the statement of Abella J. for the majority in R. v. C.L.Y.2008 SCC 2 (CanLII), [2008] 1 S.C.R. 5, at paras. 6 and 8, warrants emphasis:

[6] … This Court has consistently warned that verdicts of guilt should not be based on 'whether [triers of fact] believe the defence evidence or the Crown's evidence' … .  Rather, the paramount question remains whether, on the whole of the evidence, the trier of fact is left with a reasonable doubt about the guilt of the accused … .  The following suggested steps in [R. v. W.(D)1991 CanLII 93 (SCC), [1991] 1 S.C.R. 742, at p. 758] are intended to ensure that the trier of fact remains focused on the principle of reasonable doubt:

            First, if you believe the evidence of the accused, obviously you must acquit. 

Second, if you do not believe the testimony of the accused but you are left in reasonable doubt by it, you must acquit.

Third, even if you are not left in doubt by the evidence of the accused, you must ask yourself whether, on the basis of the evidence which you do accept, you are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt by that evidence of the guilt of the accused.


[8] … the verdict should not be based on a choice between the accused's and Crown's evidence, but on whether, based on the whole of the evidence, [triers of fact] are left with a reasonable doubt as to the accused's guilt… .

[20]        Given the higher standard required from the Crown in seeking the application of the curative proviso, the error of the trial judge in considering the contents of the Witness' police statement cannot be overcome by substituting certain portions of his testimony.  The Crown has simply not established, within the confines of the remaining evidence this Court can consider, that the evidence against the appellant is so overwhelming that his conviction is inevitable or would invariably result.


Anonymous said...

Thanks for sharing your thoughts on avoid repossession. Regards

Feel free to surf to my weblog - domino S pizza voucher codes

Anonymous said...

Informative article, totally what I needed.

My homepage best Tablet android

Anonymous said...

Amazing things here. I am very satisfied to see your post.

Thank you a lot and I am taking a look forward to contact you.

Will you please drop me a e-mail?

Also visit my web page :: google free stuff

Anonymous said...

You actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this
topic to be really something that I think I
would never understand. It seems too complicated and very
broad for me. I'm looking forward for your next post, I'll try
to get the hang of it!

Review my blog post: Quirky jewellery Uk

Anonymous said...

Thank you for some other magnificent article. The place else may just anyone get that type of information in such an ideal way of writing?
I've a presentation next week, and I am on the search for such info.

Have a look at my web page; Assistedlivingconsumers.Org

Anonymous said...

Wow, wonderful blog structure! How lengthy have you been blogging for?
you make running a blog glance easy. The full look of your website
is wonderful, let alone the content material!

Here is my web page; top market research companies uk

Anonymous said...

I read this piece of writing completely about the comparison of newest
and earlier technologies, it's remarkable article.

Also visit my blog Cars 4 Insurance

Anonymous said...

Having read this I believed it was really informative.
I appreciate you spending some time and energy to put this informative article together.
I once again find myself personally spending way too much time both reading and commenting.
But so what, it was still worth it!

Also visit my blog ... leading market research companies

Anonymous said...

I think this is one of the most vital info for me.

And i am glad reading your article. But should remark on few general things,
The web site style is wonderful, the articles is really excellent : D.
Good job, cheers

My weblog - best 7 android tablet

Anonymous said...

I visited various web pages but the audio quality for audio songs present at this website is genuinely

Have a look at my website: dominos vouchers 2013

Anonymous said...

Thanks to my father who shared with me on the topic of this web site, this
blog is in fact remarkable.

my web-site Dominos Uk Vouchers

Anonymous said...

You are so interesting! I don't think I've truly read
a single thing like this before. So good to discover somebody with some unique thoughts on this topic.

Really.. thank you for starting this up. This
web site is something that is needed on the
internet, someone with some originality!

My web blog ... google android tablet reviews

Anonymous said...

I was recommended this web site by my cousin. I'm not sure whether this post is written by him as nobody else know such detailed about my problem. You're wonderful!


My site; Care Home Turnaround

Anonymous said...

Keep this going please, great job!

my page; quirky Jewellery

Anonymous said...

Definitely believe that which you said. Your favorite justification appeared to be on the internet the easiest thing to be aware of.
I say to you, I certainly get annoyed while people think
about worries that they just don't know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top and also defined out the whole thing without having side effect , people could take a signal. Will likely be back to get more. Thanks

Also visit my web-site; car insurance calculators

Anonymous said...

There is definately a lot to learn about this subject.

I love all of the points you made.

my website: Http://

Anonymous said...

It's actually a cool and useful piece of information. I'm glad that you
shared this useful information with us. Please keep us up to date like this.
Thanks for sharing.

my site dominos Voucher codes

Anonymous said...

wonderful points altogether, you simply won a new reader.
What could you suggest about your submit that you just made some days ago?
Any sure?

Feel free to surf to my website Cms.Egsd.Org:80

Anonymous said...

It is in point of fact a great and helpful piece of information.

I am happy that you shared this helpful information with us.
Please stay us up to date like this. Thanks for sharing.

Look into my web-site - Http://

Anonymous said...

I could not refrain from commenting. Very well written!

My web page ... funky fashion jewellery