[11] Furthermore, we do not agree that the application judge had any independent obligation to become involved in the nature and extent of the evidence called by counsel on behalf of the appellant. Communications between counsel and client – meaning providing advice and taking instructions on how to present the case – are matters within the exclusive domain of client and counsel. The court is entitled to assume that the lawyer is keeping the client informed of the developments in the case and their consequences, is providing the client with his best professional advice and is following the instructions received. Other than in extraordinary circumstances such as when it is apparent that a conflict has arisen between the client and his or her counsel, the court should not, on its own accord, become involved in the actual presentation of the case.
Monday, February 4, 2013
Judicial officers should not inquire as to whether counsel are acting under instruction
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I'm amazed, I must say. Seldom do I come across a blog that's both educative and
interesting, and without a doubt, you've hit the nail on the head. The issue is an issue that too few folks are speaking intelligently about. Now i'm very happy that I found this
in my search for something concerning this.
Also visit my weblog: templates email
Post a Comment