There are three ways that a person may be involuntarily
admitted to a psychiatric facility in Ontario
for a maximum 72 hour observation period.
Note that during the period treatment may not be given except with
consent and the purpose of the admission is for assessment only. Admission for treatment after assessment is
not assured and the person may be discharged without treatment:
Police
When a person is acting in a disorderly manner, the Mental Health Act (Ontario) allows the
police to take someone already in
custody to a designated psychiatric facility for examination by a physician if
they believe that the person is an immediate danger to himself or herself, an
immediate danger to others, or not able to care for himself or herself to an
extent that physical impairment will result. The officer must also believe there
is an immediate threat of danger or physical impairment and other options for
assessment or treatment are not viable.
Justice of Peace
In situations where there is no immediate danger, anyone can
bring evidence to a justice of the peace that the person is a danger to himself
or herself, a danger to others, or is not able to care for himself or herself.
The judge can then order a person to be examined by a physician and authorize
the police to take the person to a physician for examination. Such order to the police is effective for
seven days – if the police cannot locate the person within that time another
order is required.
Physician
Where a physician (note, any physician – not necessarily a psychiatrist)
examines a person and has reasonable cause to believe that the person,
(a) has threatened
or attempted or is threatening or attempting to cause bodily harm to himself or
herself;
(b) has behaved or
is behaving violently towards another person or has caused or is causing
another person to fear bodily harm from him or her; or
(c) has shown or
is showing a lack of competence to care for himself or herself,
and if in addition the physician is of the opinion that the
person is apparently suffering from mental disorder of a nature or quality that
likely will result in,
(d) serious bodily
harm to the person;
(e) serious bodily
harm to another person; or
(f) serious
physical impairment of the person,
the physician may make application for a psychiatric
assessment of the person.
Alternatively, where a physician examines a person and has
reasonable cause to believe that the person,
(a) has previously
received treatment for mental disorder of an ongoing or recurring nature that,
when not treated, is of a nature or quality that likely will result in serious
bodily harm to the person or to another person or substantial mental or
physical deterioration of the person or serious physical impairment of the
person; and
(b) has shown
clinical improvement as a result of the treatment,
and if in addition the physician is of the opinion that the
person,
(c) is apparently
suffering from the same mental disorder as the one for which he or she
previously received treatment or from a mental disorder that is similar to the
previous one;
(d) given the
person’s history of mental disorder and current mental or physical condition,
is likely to cause serious bodily harm to himself or herself or to another
person or is likely to suffer substantial mental or physical deterioration or
serious physical impairment; and
(e) is incapable,
within the meaning of the Health Care Consent Act, 1996, of consenting to his
or her treatment in a psychiatric facility and the consent of his or her
substitute decision-maker has been obtained,
the physician may make application in the prescribed form
for a psychiatric assessment of the person.
In both cases the physician fills out a form authorizing the
police to bring the person in for a psychiatric assessment. The form has an effective similar to an order
from a Justice of the Peace.
1 comment:
James:
Thank you very much for this.
I live in Parkdale and have seen over the years two persons who would definitely have benefited from a 72 hour observation period.
On both I occasions, I asked people who were concerned about the persons if they knew, legally, what could be done for them. No one did.
The next time I see such a person, I will give a description of their continuing behaviour to the local bicycle police and hope for the best.
Thanks for the bears, as always.
Clair Culliford
Post a Comment