Tuesday, January 7, 2014

New trial ordered where trial judge took into account in assessing credibility that a Muslim chose to affirm and not swear

R v TRJ 2013 BCCA 449.

As a practical matter delving into why someone swears or affirms is NEVER prudent.
Posted by at

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

What about if they purport to have very high religiosity -- for example, what if a pastor accused of a crime testifies but chooses to affirm?

January 8, 2014 at 10:44 AM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)