Sotiropoulou v. Beaudin, 2014 ONCA 168:
[4] Counsel submits that the terms of the respondents’ counter-offer were not essential terms of the agreement. However, the law is clear. As Professor Fridman notes, “[m]ore than once has it been said that an acceptance must correspond precisely to the terms of the offer”: G.H.L. Fridman, The Law of Contract in Canada, 6th ed. (Toronto: Carswell, 2011), at p. 57. Otherwise, the purported acceptance is “at most a counter-offer, and a further communication of assent will be required from the offeror” before a contract is formed: S.D. Waddams, The Law of Contracts, 6th ed. (Toronto: Canada Law Book, 2010), at para. 60.
2 comments:
Thanks for sharing this as it is a good reminder as to what constitutes acceptance.
zzzzz2018.8.8
pandora charms outlet
maillot football pas cher
off white
christian louboutin shoes
saics running shoes
nike huarache
moncler jackets
vibram fivefingers shoes
mlb shop
cheap nfl jerseys
Post a Comment