Lawyers' Professional Indemnity Company v. Geto Investments Limited, 2007 CanLII 27756:
[93] Where a party fails to call a witness and an explanation is not provided, the court may but not must draw an adverse inference.
[94] Where a party has an evidentiary burden of establishing an issue, his failure, in certain circumstances, to call necessary evidence to support his case justifies a court in drawing the inference that the evidence of the witness who might have been called would have been unfavourable to him. The non-production of evidence that would naturally have been produced by an honest and therefore fearless claimant permits the inference that its tenor is unfavourable to the party's case.
No comments:
Post a Comment