Thursday, May 15, 2008

California's top court overturns gay marriage ban

California's top court overturns gay marriage ban

By LISA LEFF,


Associated Press Writer 40 minutes ago SAN FRANCISCO - In a monumental victory for the gay rights movement, the California Supreme Court overturned a voter-approved ban on gay marriage Thursday in a ruling that would allow same-sex couples in the nation's biggest state to tie the knot.

Domestic partnerships are not a good enough substitute for marriage, the justices ruled 4-3 in striking down the ban.

Outside the courthouse, gay marriage supporters cried and cheered as the news spread.

Jeanie Rizzo, one of the plaintiffs, called Pali Cooper, her partner of 19 years, and asked, "Pali, will you marry me?""This is a very historic day. This is just such freedom for us," Rizzo said. "This is a message that says all of us are entitled to human dignity."

In the Castro, historically a center of the gay community in San Francisco, Tim Oviatt started crying while watching the news on TV."I've been waiting for this all my life," he said. "This is a life-affirming moment."

The city of San Francisco, two dozen gay and lesbian couples and gay rights groups sued in March 2004 after the court halted the monthlong wedding march that took place when Mayor Gavin Newsom opened the doors of City Hall to same-sex marriages."Today the California Supreme Court took a giant leap to ensure that everybody — not just in the state of California, but throughout the country — will have equal treatment under the law," said City Attorney Dennis Herrera, who argued the case for San Francisco.

The challenge for gay rights advocates, however, is not over.

A coalition of religious and social conservative groups is attempting to put a measure on the November ballot that would enshrine laws banning gay marriage in the state constitution.The Secretary of State is expected to rule by the end of June whether the sponsors gathered enough signatures to qualify the marriage amendment, similar to ones enacted in 26 other states.If voters pass the measure in November, it would trump the court's decision.

California already offers same-sex couples who register as domestic partners the same legal rights and responsibilities as married spouses, including the right to divorce and to sue for child support.

But, "Our state now recognizes that an individual's capacity to establish a loving and long-term committed relationship with another person and responsibly to care for and raise children does not depend upon the individual's sexual orientation," Chief Justice Ron George wrote for the court's majority, which also included Justices Joyce Kennard, Kathryn Werdegar and Carlos Moreno.

In a dissenting opinion, Justice Marvin Baxter agreed with many arguments of the majority but said the court overstepped its authority. Changes to marriage laws should be decided by the voters, Baxter wrote. Justices Ming Chin and Carol Corrigan also dissented.

The conservative Alliance Defense Fund says it plans to ask the justices for a stay of their decision until after the fall election, said Glen Lavey, senior counsel for the group.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who has twice vetoed legislation that would've granted marriage rights to same-sex couples, said in a news release that he respected the court's decision and "will not support an amendment to the constitution that would overturn this state Supreme Court ruling."
James Morton
1100 - 5255 Yonge Street
Toronto, Ontario
M2N 6P4

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

About bloody time!! I only do not understand people's opposition to gay marriage. In my view, if two same-sex partners want to formalize their committment to each other, they should be allowed to and have all the rights associated!! (just don't my mom, or local priest, both of whom still have a big problem with a same-sex union being termed "marriage")
Society has to acknowledge that our former definition of "family" doesn't fit anymore. The days of one dad, one mom, one son, one daughter, a dog and a goldfish are gone.

Anonymous said...

When Lanthan backed up a step, putting distance between them, something behind her heart twisted. Another, smaller, band of rogues was being watched in a different part of the city. She shook her head. Radins mental warning didnt help. Let it go for now, he soothed. His palm smoothed over her forehead, gently smoothing her hair back from her face. She shook her head. Her sound roused the couple lying before her. Or even project emotion on him. Hes loved you this entire time. Her righteous rage dimmed, however, when she saw him flinch. Yelping, she twisted aside to look at Nialdlye, who held her hands up, palms out. She snapped back down to look at Brevin. His body shook, his thrusts gone ragged. She barely heard Lanthans cry, somewhat felt his thrusts. She put on her best devious grin. Theres no reason I should flourish. Clearly, Eyrhaens choice was, indeed, a relief to him. to giving herself to this man, knowing it would be right. A lifetime isnt enough to tell you how I feel about you.

Anonymous said...

She let her gaze trail slowly up the smooth, bare skin of his legs. She simply occupied a part of his brain, and now Radin was there as well. Why worry him? Nialdlyes red legs crisscrossed over his back. She knew that, on some level.
[url=http://blacky.0fees.net]black shot[/url]

Anonymous said...

sonic blaze hentai