Friday, December 19, 2008

The budget to come

Just after the election bringing Stephen Harper to power I wrote a piece asking how a nation like Canada could remove a government like that of Paul Martin.

Canada had a healthy surplus, declining debt, low inflation, low unemployment and strong economic growth.

Why would such a blessed nation change governments?

I concluded we lost the Martin election for several reasons none of which had much to do with the quality of government. The Martin government did a pretty good job in the brief time it continued. That said, it presented horribly to the Country and the false taint of corruption sealed our fate.

In the three years since Harper came to office the surplus is gone (and that before the downturn), unemployment is rising and the economy is moving from technical recession to recession to depression.

My point is not that Harper's government has destroyed the economy. While I still say the GST cut was a bad idea there is no doubt that any government would be facing tough times. Deficit spending is necessary. We will need to look at foreign trading and protecting Canadian industry.

The question is whether the Conservatives are now up to the task. The signs are promising. Consulting with the opposition, admitting the need to run deficits and generally being more humble make up for some of last month's nonsense.
James Morton

2 comments:

wilson said...

'Canada had a healthy surplus'

no it did not!
The surpluses were artificial,
not born out of good governance.

The surpluses were a result of $54Billion in illegal over taxation of the EI fund.
Those surplus EI dollars were used to balance the books.
The Supreme Court of Canada said the tax was illegal, but Liberals had the right to balnce their books with the funds.

Anonymous said...

"consulting with the opposition" only b/c Harper had a damn near miss. Say what you want about Harper but he's no dummy. "Colloborate or die" as the saying goes.
Secretly, though, I also think he wants some opposition buy in so that when things go south and voters are unhappy next time at the polls, he'll have someone to share the blame.