As a factual matter I'm not fully convinced the law was passed by both Houses and signed into law but let's assume it was.
It is still a wicked law.
Sometimes democracies pass laws that interfere with basic human rights. That's why democracies need constitutions that protect a few rights that ought to be beyond the reach of legislatures.
Now often Courts enforcing these "few rights" extend their reach too far. But that doesn't mean the "few rights" should ignored.
Remember, Robert Mugabe was elected President.
Afghan cleric defends contentious marriage law
RAHIM FAIEZ AND HEIDI VOGT
KABUL — A key backer of an Afghan law that critics say legalizes marital rape and rolls back women's rights rejected an international outcry as foreign meddling on Saturday and insisted the legislation offers women many protections. The law, passed last month, says a husband can demand sex with his wife every four days unless she is ill or would be harmed by intercourse, and regulates when and for what reasons a wife may leave her home alone. ... .
Following an international uproar, in which President Barack Obama called the law "abhorrent," Afghan President Hamid Karzai put it under review. The move puts enforcement on hold. Mohammad Asif Mohseni, a top Afghan cleric who was one of the law's main drafters, said the legislation cannot be revoked or changed because it was enacted through a legislative process — passed by both houses of parliament and signed by Mr. Karzai.
He condemned the outcry, saying Western countries were trying to thwart democracy when results did not please them. "The Westerners claim that they have brought democracy to Afghanistan. What does democracy mean? It means government by the people for the people. They should let the people use these democratic rights," Mr. Mohseni told reporters in the capital, Kabul. Surrounded by supporters, Mr. Mohseni unfurled reams of paper with hundreds of women's signatures and thumbprints backing the law. The legislation came out of three years of debate and revision involving both Islamic scholars and members of parliament, Mr. Mohseni said.
James Morton
3 comments:
Eye-opening commentary James.
Voting is a necessary but not a sufficient condition of democracy.
We have our own cynical politicians who like to encourage people to believe that democracy equals voting, full stop, and who hate the courts for defending the full range of basic principles and structures of genuine democracy. And if we let that go on, this is where it will lead.
In any country where that is happening, including ours, there is something seriously wrong with the education system.
If divorce is legal it is actually the part of the law that restricts mobility from home I have a problem with. Canadian soldiers aren't racking up mental diseases to help bring about a North Korea there.
Restricting mobility of women prevents long-term economic growth unless you really bolster @home careers.
Post a Comment