R. v. Dwyer, 2013  ONCA 34 deals with forfeiture of proceeds of crime and fines in lieu thereof.   
Section 462.37 of the Criminal Code provides for the forfeiture of the  proceeds of crime where an offender is convicted of a designated offence. Fraud  over $5,000 is a designated offence: s. 462.3(1). Section 462.37 also provides  for a fine in lieu of forfeiture pursuant to subsection (3) if the court is  satisfied that a forfeiture order should be made in respect of any property but  that property or any part of it cannot be made subject to an order. Subsection  (4) requires the court to impose a term of imprisonment in default of payment  of the fine, the length of the term depending on the amount of the fine.
The Court makes clear that a fine can be made only where the offender  has possession or control of the property in question or at least had  possession of the property at some point.  Evidence of same is  necessary.  The Court holds:
[24]        In my view, an order for a fine in lieu of forfeiture can be made under s. 462.37(3)  only where the offender has possession or control of the property in question  or at least had possession of the property at some point. This conclusion flows  from the use of the phrase “any property of an offender” in s.  462.37(3) and the definition of “property” in s. 2. Such an  interpretation is consistent with the objectives of s. 462.37, which are to  deprive offenders of the proceeds of crime and ensure that they do not benefit  from those proceeds: see R. v. Appleby,  2009 NLCA 6, 242 C.C.C. (3d) 229, at paras. 26, 32-33. Those objectives would  not be furthered by making orders in relation to property that was never in the  possession of the offender, over which the offender never had control and from  which the offender did not benefit: see also R.  v. Mackenzie, [2002] O.J. No. 2512 (C.J.).
[27]        In my view, given the Crown’s failure to prove even on a balance of  probabilities that the appellant had possession or control of the missing  funds, I can see no basis for making the order for a fine in lieu of forfeiture  except as stated above.
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment