R. v. Buzizi 2013 SCC 27:
[16] ... As the Court held in Cinous, "the air of reality test [is not] intended to assess whether the defence is likely, unlikely, somewhat likely, or very likely to succeed at the end of the day" (R. v. Cinous, 2002 SCC 29, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 3, at para. 54). Rather, the relevant question is whether the record contains a sufficient factual foundation for a properly instructed jury to give effect to the defence.
2 comments:
I have absolutely no clue as to why I check this blog. If you are not posting something totally irrelevant, I have no clue as to what you are posting.
You are amusing in the same way that I don't understand haiku. I read it but I not only don't understand it but it doesn't matter.
Thank you for taking the time to post your blog.
Wow! Finally I got a blog from where I know how to really get valuable data concerning
my study and knowledge.
Also visit my blog post: That guy
Post a Comment